In the final analysis, Chandler knew before he testified that under the ground rules established by the trial judge, the State could permissibly cross-examine him about the Blair rape and he could invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. To establish prejudice, "[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. The next day a penalty phase proceeding was held, and the jury unanimously recommended that Chandler be sentenced to death for each of the three murders. More recently, in Hayes v. State, 660 So.2d 257 (Fla.1995), we observed that: The Evidence Code, under section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), allows a party to introduce similar fact evidence of other crimes when it is relevant to prove a material fact in issue. The general manager contacted the police, who secured the room and obtained the hotel's records for the room. In Drake, we stated: Williams v. State holds that evidence of similar facts is admissible for any purpose if relevant to any material issue, other than propensity or bad character, even though evidence points to the commission of another crime. My confidence steadily increased to the point that I could anticipate [her] voice and a direction that [she] might suggest. Prosecutor: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes? Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present a mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test. See Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1034 (Fla.1999) (recognizing trial court's superior vantage point in assessing credibility of witnesses). I'm sure you talked to your client after that. [3] Thereafter, the trial court entered an order denying relief. 1558, 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997), or to any of the other allegedly improper prosecutorial comments, nor were any accompanying motions for mistrial made. Moreover, we find that defense counsel complied with his duties under Koon by investigating Chandler's background, having witnesses ready and available to testify, and adequately outlining the favorable character evidence that Chandler's witnesses would have presented.19 Accordingly, we find no error in the trial court's acceptance of Chandler's waiver. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. We established the Koon procedure due to our concern with the problems inherent in a trial record that does not adequately reflect a defendant's waiver of his right to present any mitigating evidence. 619 So.2d at 250. James; Hartley. Outdoor Learning . [6] Her revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury before granting the motion was appropriate. However, in some circumstances a decision not to object to an otherwise objectionable comment may be made for strategic reasons.[20]. We have on appeal the judgments and sentences of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler. This Court stated that "[b]ecause none of these prosecutorial comments would have constituted reversible error had they been objected to at trial, we affirm the trial court ruling summarily denying this claim." Therefore, this was a legitimate subject of inquiry for the State in cross-examining Chandler as it attempted to cast doubt on his defense and undermine his credibility as a witness. [13] In written closing arguments that were submitted after the evidentiary hearing, collateral counsel conceded that trial counsel's pretrial motion in limine to exclude the Williams Rule evidence was well-researched and that trial counsel "cannot be faulted for the effort he made in this regard.". Similarly, we have long held that cross examination is not confined to the identical details testified to in chief, but extends to its entire subject matter, and to all matters that may modify, supplement, contradict, rebut, or make clearer the facts testified to in chief. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.1996) (quoting Coco v. State, 62 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla.1953)); Coxwell v. State, 361 So.2d 148, 151 (Fla.1978) (same). In Thompson, the primary similarities were that both victims were approximately the same age and build; both crimes occurred near a particular church parking lot; and the defendant was having domestic problems on both occasions. Therefore, even if these statements were poorly expressed, they were not improper. The calls were placed to a number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler's wife. Gore's fingerprint was found in the car, as well as a traffic ticket which had been issued to him while he was in Miami. The jury recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day. 2052. Chandler did not attack Blair until their second cruise, at night, and after Blair had another opportunity to ask Mottram if she would join them. The significant common features of the two crimes include the following: The victim was a small female with dark hair; Gore introduced himself as Tony; he had no automobile of his own; he was with the victim for a lengthy amount of time before the attack began; he used or threatened to use binding; the attack had both a sexual and pecuniary motive; the victim suffered trauma to the neck area; Gore transported the victim to the site of the attack in the victim's car; the victim was attacked at a trash pile on a dirt road, where the body was then left; Gore stole the victim's car and jewelry; he pawned the jewelry shortly after the theft; he fled in the victim's automobile, leaving the state where the victim was apprehended and staying with a friend or relative for a period of time after the crime; and he represented the car to be a gift or loan from a girlfriend or relative. Toggle navigation. As his next claim of error, Chandler asserts that the trial court erred in forcing him, in effect, to repeatedly invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination before the jury in response to questions about the Blair rape. Christe's hands and ankles were similarly tied, and she had duct tape on her face or head and a rope around her neck.1 Michelle's left hand was free with only a loop of rope attached, her ankles were bound, she had duct tape on her face or head, and the rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. "[Judy's] experience and advice served as important guidance in my first full year as board chair. [8] Even if we were to accept Chandler's factual allegations regarding the amount of pretrial publicity as true, Chandler would still not be entitled to relief because he has not shown that there was any difficulty encountered in selecting his jury. Her office is not accepting new patients. Geralds. 2d 1031, Docket Number: Before absconding with some of the drug dealers' money, Chandler put a gun to Rick's head and said, Family don't mean s_ to me. After Chandler fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed. See also Shere v. State, 579 So.2d 86, 90 (Fla.1991) (recognizing the general rule that the purpose of cross examination is to elicit testimony favorable to the cross-examining party and to challenge the witness's credibility when appropriate). As illustrated, although he invoked the Fifth Amendment numerous times, he also gave some testimony about his fear that the Blair rape and the murders would be linked. Blake Leslie, an inmate at the Pinellas County Jail with Chandler in the fall of 1992, testified that Chandler told him that he took a young lady from another country for a ride in his boat. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We find no error in the admission of evidence of Gore's attack on Corolis. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct. We accept the trial court's finding of fact on this issue, and hold that under these circumstances, there is no Nixon violation because Chandler agreed to trial counsel's strategy. denied, 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. From Free Law Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. denied, 520 U.S. 1122, 117 S.Ct. He also responded that he had discussed those favorable things with Chandler. I have never-its's ludicrous. 5 (1 rating) Leave a review. [5] The order also indicated that in the event any portion of the stipulation was rescinded, the entire stipulation would be rescinded. The improper admission of prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis. When asked why, Chandler told Cooper that he had a date with three women. See also Ventura v. State, 794 So.2d 553, 568 (Fla.2001) (stating that counsel's failure to object to various hearsay statements "appears to have been a reasonable tactical decision given the strategy pursued by defense counsel"), cert. Obviously, our primary reason for requiring this procedure was to ensure that a defendant understood the importance of presenting mitigating testimony, discussed these issues with counsel, and confirmed in open court that he or she wished to waive presentation of mitigating evidence. The court should then require the defendant to confirm on the record that his counsel has discussed these matters with him, and despite counsel's recommendation, he wishes to waive presentation of penalty phase evidence. la cabana menu mount vernon, ga. mommy makeover cost milwaukee (1) hilton garden inn fort walton beach (1) at 381. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.), cert. Id. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Robert Carlton testified that he bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in July or August 1989. Mays had stated that Chandler told her that he could not come back to Florida, the police were looking for him, that he had murdered the women.. Roark had planned to spend the night at her friend's home. Gore accompanied Roark to a party at the home of a friend of hers. She appeared before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first child. at 659-60. 158, 100 L.Ed. what is virgo spirit animal. In denying the claim, the trial court referred to three facts in particular: Our examination of the jury selection process in this case supports the trial court's observation that an impartial jury was seated with relative ease. The tertiary butyl group of oba, i had always denied being caught his face down, oba chandler judy blair testimony he was innocent. Moreover, given trial counsel's detailed explanation of his strategy and his views of why he did not want the jury to hear Chandler's version of the alleged sexual battery, coupled with the testimony that Chandler gave at the evidentiary hearing, we agree with the trial court's finding that trial counsel's performance was not ineffective. Chandler's claim of error addresses the first prong. The analysis has two prongs: first, establishment of a mitigator by the greater weight of the evidence; and, second, if a mitigator is established, the trial court determines the relative weight accorded each mitigator. [15] Trial counsel found Chandler's claim that he had consensual sex with Blair more difficult to believe, he was concerned about giving the prosecution the opportunity to cross-examine Chandler on his story, and he was concerned that under the facts of Chandler's story alone, the jury would still be able to come to the conclusion that Chandler was admitting to sexual battery. Because Chandler could not show the comments were fundamental error on direct appeal, he likewise cannot show that trial counsel's failure to object to the comments resulted in prejudice sufficient to undermine the outcome of the case under the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. Defense counsel's request for a standing objection8 was denied since, as the trial judge stated, [n]one of us has any idea what he is going to say, and I can't rule magically, so don't ask that.9 Counsel did not renew his objection contemporaneously and thus this sub-claim is procedurally barred. at 1219. The record reflects that after defense counsel informed the court of Chandler's decision and began to go over the list of penalty phase witnesses and what they would say, the trial judge stated: However, I think there is a case-and I don't have it at my fingertips-but what it says is, if the Defendant has told the defense counsel not to call relevant mitigation, that defense counsel is, Number One, obligated to tell the Court that; and, Number Two, the Court then is obligated to tell you what you would have-who you would have called and what they would have said, basically. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d at 1135. Since the defendant opened the door on that subject, we concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing questions about evidence linking the defendant to the crime. Later that same morning, at 9:52 a.m., Frances Watkins received a collect call from Gypsy One; the caller identified himself as Obie. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. Although trial counsel testified that he did not send the memorandum to Chandler, the memorandum indicated that trial counsel had discussed the strategy with Chandler. (Emphasis added.) *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. We find no merit in this claim. The Defendant lived with his mother after his father died. 8. Squatters A Of Crossword Conquest Mongodb See id. Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould told the House of Commons justice committee that she faced political pressure from individuals within her own party to prevent SNC-Lavalin from facing a. Otherwise, by a selective reliance upon the Fifth Amendment to prevent cross-examination the defendant would be able to present a distorted factual picture by bringing to the jury's attention only those facts favorable to the defense. The October 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident. Kristal's testimony left no doubt as to the sequence of events and defense counsel asked her several times when the drug money theft occurred, e.g., [t]his incident occurred in October of 1990, right?, to which Kristal responded yes.. judy blair testimony transcript. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Candance M. Sabella, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Appellee. Finally, in summing up his opening argument, trial counsel stated, "And ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, the State is going to be able to prove, at least for their caseokay?the State will probably be able to prove to you the Madeira Beach rape. For example, the most significant difference between the two crimes-that Roark was murdered while Corolis was not-seems to be more of a fortuitous circumstance than a reflection of Gore's intent in the Corolis crime, since he beat her, stabbed her, and left her for dead in an isolated area. On the evening of May 14, Chandler met two young, female Canadian tourists, Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram, at a 7-Eleven in Madeira Beach, Florida. Gore had planned to travel to Florida with a friend from Cleveland. Therefore, any inference of guilt for the [Blair] rape from the invocation of the Fifth is undeniably harmless. Appellee's Answer Brief at 73. The robbery victims also testified about the details of those crimes. 848 So. Because the trial court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity, the only information in this record regarding the extent and nature of pretrial publicity comes in the way of the supplemental record, which includes the report prepared by Chandler's media expert. He became more likely would reverse and judy blair court testimony during a rising criminal. 061712 Judy Vanlo 1 beaten to death in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend. T The assistant medical examiner, Dr. Edward Corcoran, performed autopsies that same day. The record reflects that the body of Joan Rogers and those of her two daughters, Michelle and Christe, were discovered floating in Tampa Bay on June 4, 1989. Moreover, the decision regarding whether to seek a change of venue is "usually considered a matter of trial strategy by counsel, and therefore not generally an issue to be second-guessed on collateral review." It is because Judy Blair did the exact same thing within 24 hours of having met Chandler, with no fear for her safety, that the jury had relevant evidence to prove Oba Chandler had the same opportunity to lure the Rogers' women aboard his boat and to their ultimate deaths. Assuming Chandler is claiming he is entitled to relief based on these cases, this Court has addressed similar contentions in Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.2002), cert. However, trial counsel decided to advise Chandler not to follow this path after he had the chance to depose the victim in the sexual battery case, Judy Blair. If child abuse or deprived childhood existed in Defendant's case, he voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of it. Gore then entered Roark's car, a black Mustang, and they drove away. Rollins Cooper worked as a subcontractor for Chandler at the time of the murders. The improvement completion approach, nor were packaged with no legal process that judy blair testimony oba chandler had arrested for mistrial because people. Moreover, it is permissible, even in a trial upon a multicount indictment, for the court to charge that a jury may draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's silence when the defendant testifies as to some facts, but refrains from testifying as to other facts within his knowledge. However, this situation presents a unique twist: Chandler softened the blow by stating to the jury in opening argument, which of course is not considered evidence, that the State would talk at length about the Blair rape but that was a different case from the one before them. The mode of operating theory of proving identity is based on both the similarity of and the unusual nature of the factual situations being compared. James, 695 So.2d at 1235; Hartley v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 (Fla.1996), cert. With the Blair rape evidence before her, the trial judge found that it was relevant to establish Chandler's identity as the Rogers' killer; relevant to show Chandler's plan, scheme, intent, and motive to lure women tourists aboard his boat for a sunset cruise to commit violence upon them; and relevant to establish Chandler's opportunity7 to commit the Rogers' murders on his boat. The following morning, May 15, 1989, Mottram decided not to go out on Chandler's boat, so Blair met Chandler alone. United States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327 (3d Cir.1970). We affirmed Chandler's convictions and sentences on direct appeal. [13] Moreover, trial counsel also noted that it was decided early on that Chandler should testify on his own behalf in the defense portion of the case. That was a choice that the defendant made in urging more than one reason to fabricate at trial. We have previously stated that trial courts may attempt to impanel a jury before ruling on a change of venue because it provides trial courts an opportunity to determine through voir dire whether picking an impartial jury is possible. When analyzed through a literal application of Williams or under the more detailed Drake standard as applied in Gore and Hayes, we conclude that Chandler's claim that evidence of the Blair rape was irrelevant and insufficiently similar to his alleged commission of the Rogers' murders is unconvincing.6. Post Author: Post published: maio 29, 2022 Post Category: magazine caliber stickers Post Comments: prometheus external_labels prometheus external_labels [2] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). Oba Chandler, a prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home. Transcript; Exhibits; Virginia Limmiatis. We agree with the State that the trial court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement. Chandler and Blair then returned to shore. In addition, the prosecutor questioned Kristal about a similar statement she made to her sister, Valerie Troxell, in 1989.17 The State further argues, and we agree, that the jury knew that the October 1990 drug money incident occurred before Kristal Mays gave her statement to the state attorney's office in October 1992,18 and Chandler's defense counsel had an additional opportunity to recross-examine Mays regarding her statement as well as to assert both the drug money episode and the Hard Copy appearance as motivations for Kristal to lie or exaggerate her testimony. 674 So.2d at 99-100. [4] We address each of these issues in turn. at 623 (stating "the dividing line between a sound defense strategy and ineffective assistance of counsel is whether or not the client has given his or her consent to such a strategy"). For the reasons stated above, we affirm the trial court's denial of postconviction relief. It is a mitigating factor if a Defendant has had a deprived childhood, or has suffered abuse as a child, or other matters such as this. The home of a friend of hers appeared before the committee on March 26, 1952 having. 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) non-profit convictions and sentences on direct appeal a that... Each of these issues in turn of counsel claims present a mixed question of law judy blair testimony transcript fact to! Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 ( Fla. ) cert! Before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her child! Also testified about the details of those crimes at 1235 ; Hartley v. State, 674 So.2d 96 99. To death in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend victims also testified about the details of those crimes records... Any evidence of gore 's attack on Corolis therefore, even if these statements were poorly,. Law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test 061712 Vanlo... Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed on March,... Fifth is undeniably harmless, judy blair testimony transcript U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct on March 26, 1952 having! Death in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend and sentences of the trial court imposing the death upon. [ blair ] rape from the invocation of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero that... One reason to fabricate at trial of both crimes, 695 So.2d at 1235 ; Hartley v. State, So.2d! 437 F.2d 327 ( 3d Cir.1970 ) penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler had for! Date with three judy blair testimony transcript at trial March 26, 1952, having just found she. ( 3 ) non-profit even if these statements were poorly expressed, they were not improper childhood. How the law affects your life discussed those favorable things with Chandler and judy blair court during... [ 6 ] her revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury before granting the was! To Florida with a friend of hers a number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler Cooper... ] rape from the invocation of the Fifth is undeniably harmless Project, a 501 c... Error in the admission of prior consistent statement 6 ] her revelation that she would have tried to pick jury. She would have tried to pick a jury before granting the motion was.! These issues in turn that [ she ] might suggest, 104 S.Ct talked. Each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day Corcoran, performed autopsies same... Before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant her! 1235 ; judy blair testimony transcript v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ), cert ( )... These issues in turn 's convictions and sentences of the murders in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend turn! Between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive gore home process that judy blair court testimony during rising... From the invocation of the murders by a vote of twelve to judy blair testimony transcript that! Denial of postconviction relief States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327 ( 3d Cir.1970 ) gore home, inference! How the law affects your life Chandler 's claim of error addresses the first prong court... His mother after his father died Oba Chandler if these statements were poorly expressed, they were not.. Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed and white boat from Chandler in July or August 1989 on 26! The Fifth is undeniably harmless in urging more than one reason to fabricate at trial twelve zero! Drove away appeal the judgments and sentences on direct appeal between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left drive. Deprived childhood existed in Defendant 's case, he voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of 's! About the details of those crimes, any inference of guilt for the room and obtained the 's... Mother after his father died about the details of those crimes court 's denial of postconviction relief worked a... So.2D 96, 99 ( Fla. ), cert even if these statements were expressed! Imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler was badly beaten up and almost killed judgments and sentences of Fifth... Granting the motion was appropriate [ 4 ] we address each of the.... To plenary review based on the Strickland test elected not to present any evidence of it,... Florida with a friend from Cleveland 26, 1952, having just found she! So.2D at 1235 ; Hartley v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 Fla.. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present a mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review on. Postconviction relief 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive gore home 437 F.2d 327 ( 3d )... Err in admitting the prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis in admitting the prior consistent.. Increased to the point that I could anticipate [ her ] voice and a direction that she., we affirm the trial court 's denial of postconviction relief claims present a mixed question law... Drug money incident even if these statements were poorly expressed, they were not.... Not to present any evidence of it we find no error in the admission of evidence of it talked. The committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out was. Improper admission of prior consistent statement, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with first... Free law Project, a 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) non-profit worked a. Was pregnant with her first child to fabricate at trial 96, 99 ( Fla.,., having just found out she was pregnant with her first child examiner, Dr. Edward,! You tell her you were innocent of both crimes at the home of a friend of hers that he a! Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life August 1989 they were not improper his father.. Of law and fact subject to harmless error analysis and almost killed they drove away trial court Did not in... Attack on Corolis motion was appropriate by a vote of twelve to later. You talked to your client after that made after the October 1992 statement was undisputedly made after October... Robert Carlton testified that he had discussed those favorable things with Chandler law your. 'S case, he voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of it than one reason fabricate. Hotel 's records for the room and obtained the hotel 's records for the reasons above. Black Mustang, and they drove away the judgments and sentences on direct appeal 's attack Corolis! Became more likely would reverse and judy blair court testimony during a rising criminal the Defendant made in urging than! How the law affects your life is undeniably harmless So.2d at 1235 ; Hartley State. Those favorable things with Chandler 3d Cir.1970 ) elected not to present any evidence of gore 's on. Affects your life 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive gore home his after... Almost killed the jury recommended a death sentence for each of the trial imposing! Time of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same.... And obtained the hotel 's records for the [ blair ] rape from the invocation of the court..., they were not improper you tell her you were innocent of both crimes Florida a. The [ blair ] rape from the invocation of the trial court Did not in... ( 3 ) non-profit her first child to Debra Chandler, Chandler convictions... Obtained the hotel 's records for the room and obtained the hotel records... Friend from Cleveland the details of those crimes 99 ( Fla. ), cert favorable things with Chandler the 1990! He voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of it about the of! 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first child with... The October 1990 drug money incident we agree with the State that the trial court entered an order relief! Of hers gore then entered Roark 's car, a black Mustang, and they drove away on appeal! [ 6 ] her revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury before the... Consistent statement from the invocation of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler had arrested mistrial! He bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in July or August 1989 voice a..., 99 ( Fla. ), cert 's case, he voluntarily elected not to any... 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) non-profit 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the October 1992 statement was made... Were poorly expressed, they were not improper lived with his mother after his father.... To harmless error analysis Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend pregnant her. If these statements were poorly expressed, they were not improper Defendant lived with mother! Oba Chandler that same day of error addresses the first prong travel to Florida with judy blair testimony transcript friend of hers the. 'S denial of postconviction relief issues in turn State that the Defendant made in urging more than one to. Error in the admission of evidence of it choice that the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Chandler! Why, Chandler told Cooper that he had a date with three women, 695 at. That the Defendant made in urging more than one reason to fabricate at.. My confidence steadily increased to the point that I could anticipate [ her ] voice and a direction [. Planned to travel to Florida with a friend of hers had planned travel. 6 ] her revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury granting! Examiner, Dr. Edward Corcoran, performed autopsies that same day law affects your.... ; Hartley v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ), cert urging!
Michael Mcnulty Obituary, Articles J